Current:Home > MySome companies plan to increase return-to-office requirements, despite risk of losing talent -RiskWatch
Some companies plan to increase return-to-office requirements, despite risk of losing talent
View
Date:2025-04-16 15:45:12
A quarter of U.S. companies will require its workers to show up at the office more often next year, even though doing so may cause some productive staff members to leave.
That's according to new findings from ResumeBuilder.com which surveyed 756 employers at companies with return-to-office policies in place since 2021. RTO mandates have been one of the most divisive issues in corporate America since the nation emerged from the pandemic, with companies and employees often clashing over policies.
Among companies planning to require an increased number of days in office, 86% cited productivity as the top reason for doing so. That was followed by a desire to improve company culture (71%), employee well-being (57%) and retention (55%).
However, the findings of at least one study on RTO mandates seems to contradict those motives. Research from the Katz Graduate School of Business at the University of Pittsburgh, found that RTO mandates have no impact on companies' financial performance. It also found that RTO policies can cause a "significant decline" in employee satisfaction. That may explain why 80% of companies in Resume Builder's survey said they have lost talent as a result of their RTO policy.
"Unfortunately, I think many business leaders make assumptions about things like productivity, culture, and employee well-being," Julia Toothacre, resume and career strategist at Resume Builder, said the report. "Productivity is a result of clear expectations and good management. Culture is driven by people, not physical spaces, and employee well-being is more about how people are managed, their stress levels, and the amount of flexibility they have."
The survey also found that 45% of companies will not push employees to come into the office more often next year, choosing to leave their current RTO policy as is. Another 21% said employees will be allowed to come in less frequently in 2025.
Still, an overwhelming 93% of business leaders believe employees should be physically present in the office and therefore support RTO mandates. Most employers currently require that employees work in office a certain number of days, with 38% enforcing a minimum of three days per week. Amazon, Apple, and Starbucks are among the companies now requiring workers to come in three days a week.
As work-life balance becomes a higher priority for employees, however, Toothacre says companies can expect more walkouts as a result of RTO mandates.
"People may have moved and aren't willing to move again to keep their position," she said. "It's also possible that there are familial responsibilities that require a flexible schedule or the need to be at home. Some people also like working from home or remotely and don't want to return to an office environment."
ResumeBuilder.com drew its results from a May survey of business owners, human resource managers, supervisors, CEOs, senior managers and other top decision-makers at companies. The respondents were all over age 25, made over $75,000 a year and had an education higher than a high school diploma.
Khristopher J. BrooksKhristopher J. Brooks is a reporter for CBS MoneyWatch. He previously worked as a reporter for the Omaha World-Herald, Newsday and the Florida Times-Union. His reporting primarily focuses on the U.S. housing market, the business of sports and bankruptcy.
TwitterveryGood! (4267)
Related
- North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
- Jewelry chain apologizes for not accepting U.S. service member's Puerto Rico driver's license as valid U.S. ID
- Dozens of Countries Take Aim at Climate Super Pollutants
- Colorado Court Strikes Down Local Fracking Restrictions
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- Trump: America First on Fossil Fuels, Last on Climate Change
- Climate Forum Reveals a Democratic Party Remarkably Aligned with Science on Zero Emissions
- Trump Strips California’s Right to Set Tougher Auto Standards
- Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
- Indiana doctor sues AG to block him from obtaining patient abortion records
Ranking
- Could your smelly farts help science?
- Hendra virus rarely spills from animals to us. Climate change makes it a bigger threat
- Kendall Roy's Penthouse on Succession Is Just as Grand (and Expensive) as You'd Imagine
- Today’s Climate: August 19, 2010
- Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
- 20 teens injured when Texas beach boardwalk collapses
- Jennifer Garner Reveals Why Her Kids Prefer to Watch Dad Ben Affleck’s Movies
- 24-Hour Sephora Deal: 50% Off a Bio Ionic Iron That Curls or Straightens Hair in Less Than 10 Minutes
Recommendation
'Most Whopper
Only Kim Kardashian Could Make Wearing a Graphic Tee and Mom Jeans Look Glam
The Mugler H&M Collection Is Here at Last— & It's a Fashion Revolution
Today’s Climate: August 5, 2010
South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
Ozempic side effects could lead to hospitalization — and doctors warn that long-term impacts remain unknown
Fossil Fuels on Federal Lands: Phase-Out Needed for Climate Goals, Study Says
Coastal Real Estate Worth Billions at Risk of Chronic Flooding as Sea Level Rises